Friday, January 2, 2009

Jeevitha and rajashekar comments on Pawan Kalyan and chiranjeevi

It is the chain reaction of Pawan kalyan’s personalised comments on Congress party and its leaders. Dr.Rajashekar and his wife participating in a hot discussion conducted by a private TV channel, both of them heavily came down on PR president Chiranjeevi , and his younger brother Pawan kalyan.

Dr.Rajashekar asked whether Chiranjeevi is feeling himself as a god to give Darshan to the people? “ Chiranjeevi has no basic knowledge about the politics, but he is acting as a matured politician. First, he should avoid acting as a saviour of the people and learn how to serve the people. He should serve the people first for two or three years and then ask them for votes. What did he done for the people all these years, is nothing but running a blood bank on purely commercial basis?

He earned crores of rupees from his fans with his films, but spent nothing for them. He not even bothered for his fans, who came from far away places, just to have a shake hand with him. He is a man of selfishness. He proved it during his film career. He never entertained the industry people who sought his help in distress. How can a person like him expected of giving social justice? How can people rely on him?

Chiranjeevi , despite having large resources, did nothing for the poor and needy. His brother Pawan kalyan is yet another political joker, grandly announced about the voluntary organisation named, Common man Protection Force and signed Rs. One crore cheque in favour of it in the presence of media. But where are that force and the cheque? The cheque he took out from one of his pocket disappeared into his other pocket. This is the way they both serve the people if elected. People can understand their selfish nature and avoid vote for them. If the people vote them to power they have to suffer for five long years with out any scope or hope.”

Congress leader Jeevitha, participating in a discussion conducted by a private TV channel along with her husband Dr.Rajashekar, she hurled some straight questions to PR president Chiranjeevi

She, demanded him to explain why would not he allow his daughter and her husband to join the family? Why did he let his brother Pawan to fight a legal battle with his wife Nandini for a divorce? Why did he allow the illegal relationship between his younger brother Pawan and Renuka Desai who is living with him? If PR is committed for love and service as it embossed on its banners, why don’t they share their love with their own family members first? When they fail to have a strong bond of love among them, how can people expect from them unconditional love and service?

Jeevitha recalled their experience with a party thrown by Chiranjeevi ‘When we both went to the party no body cared to receive us. Pawan who is roaming near us never felt it necessary to wish us or to receive our thanks for invitation. Chiranjeevi who is hosting the party is with a feeling that it is our luck to be there and we all had his grace, as if he is a god dropped from the heavenly skies. Is it the way they spread love and service to the people?

Jeevitha bashing further, raised doubts about the PR attitude towards a happy and peaceful society that they are telling about in their meetings. ‘ Chiranjeevi and his brother Pawan kalyan is saying Mother Theresa is their inspiration and they said to be following the path she laid. But on the other hand, Chiranjeevi is twirling his moustache and slapping his thighs like street rowdies. His latest statement at New Delhi, “I myself am a symbol of victory” is another thing that spells about his proud ness as if he is every thing to PR. I like to ask Chiranjeevi , whether there is any other leaders worth in his party or he is alone?

Jeevitha, bashing at Pawan kalyan said that, his immaturity in the politics could be seen with his speech. Yesterday he targeted the most senior and experienced Congress leaders in a highly abusive manner. He might be hero in the film industry, but here he is a big zero. He does not know how to speak in the public. He felt energetic with his abusive language. Can he face the same response from the others? How can he serve the people when he is leading a most moral less life?’

No comments: